The policy analysis and guidance you need by the experts you trust, daily.
- After Hours
- Agent Oversight
- Brain Food
- Health Insurance Exchanges
- Part D
- Performance Optimization
- Policy & Health Reform
- Prospective Evaluations
- Provider Relations
- Risk Adjustment
- Sales & Marketing
- Star Ratings
- Sharon Willliams on A New Source of Capital for Star Ratings and Clinical Innovations
- William on Will Trump and Price Pull Out the Scalpels for Star Ratings?
- Bobby on January Release of the Draft MMG – Perfect Timing
- Pam Lassila on Best Practices and Common Conditions of Audit Preparation
- Capitol Hill Healthcare Update | Gorman Health Group Blog on What Trump Could Actually Do to ObamaCare, Day One, Without Congress
Tag Archives: Star Ratings
June 28, 2017 | Nilsa Lennig Rudisill
I was on a client call last week with a few of our Gorman Health Group Sales, Marketing & Strategy subject matter experts presenting a sales and marketing budget the team created to help illustrate pre-operational investments in sales distribution and marketing strategies to a potential “new market” entrant. These budgets are two pieces of a much larger “Go, No Go” analysis we performed for this client, however, the discussion around these budgets led to a question from our client’s CEO that could, in essence, define the future success of this health plan in Medicare Advantage: “Does this budget account for initiatives that will enhance the members’ experience?”
May 11, 2017 | John Gorman
For years, every conversation we’ve had with clients about improving Star Ratings and launching clinical innovation projects involved a common barrier to progress: money. So for months, we have been working to bring a new source of capital to the health plan and provider industries to help drive this evolution, called social impact investing. We are getting some early successes and can ask, “If money was no object, what initiatives would you chase?”
May 4, 2017 | Melissa Smith
Last week I had the pleasure of spending a few days with some of the industry’s leading experts at our annual client forum. One of my favorite things about this now-annual tradition is the opportunity to look beyond the Star Ratings measures to share innovation experiences, hear more about emerging best practices, and level-set amongst ourselves about past “best practices” that have become “industry standard” (and those that are completely out of date).
April 20, 2017 | Melissa Smith
Few would argue Star Ratings is overdue for evolution. With almost 50 Star Ratings measures, many having been in the program for years, and Secretary Price and Administrator Verma both positioned to make their mark on Medicare, change is imminent. But change is also difficult, a fact acknowledged by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) when it reversed course in the 2018 Call Letter on several proposals included in the Advance Notice.
March 30, 2017 | Elena Martin
For almost two years, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has been publishing information and proposing new regulations regarding the criticality of ensuring beneficiaries not only have access to care, but access to accurate information with which to make informed decisions about their healthcare coverage. Data integrity is at the forefront of the initiatives enforced by government mandates, and provider data has topped the list of areas that not only need the most improvement, but the most oversight, correction, and, potentially, sanction. As we saw with the CMS network requirement changes, many plans were unprepared to submit their entire network footprint in their service area expansion applications. By moving the online directory guidance in the Medicare Managed Care Manual from Chapter 3 (Marketing) to Chapter 4 (Beneficiary Protections), CMS has solidified the fact it is no longer acceptable to have inaccuracies in an area key for members to evaluate their health plan choices and find access to care. CMS released its first “Online Provider Directory Review Report” in January 2017 and followed up on January 17, 2017, with a CMS Memo on Provider Directory Policy Updates.
March 1, 2017 | Regan Pennypacker
Within the Draft Calendar Year 2018 Call Letter, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) acknowledged the valuable comments received from the industry related to the use of audit findings and enforcement actions in the Star Ratings Program. As a result of those comments, CMS proposes a revision of the Beneficiary Access and Performance Problems (BAPP) measure.
February 15, 2017 | John Gorman
Star Ratings have driven the market in Medicare Advantage (MA) and Part D since the Affordable Care Act turned the consumer information tool into the biggest experiment in value-based payment on the planet. There’s little argument Star Ratings is working, and MA quality has improved. The program is being adopted in the ObamaCare Health Insurance Marketplace, and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) included the Quality Reporting System, or Stars for Medicaid, starting in 2019. Then Trump got elected President and appointed Tom Price the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary. Could they pull out the scalpels for Star Ratings?