Jessica Smith

The New World of Data Submissions: Know Your Data

Leave a comment | Share | |

Even though the year has just begun, the healthcare industry is looking ahead to what the next four years has in store. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its 2018 Medicare Advantage and Part D Advance Notice and Draft Call Letter (“2018 Draft Call Letter”) on February 1, 2017. As a whole, the 2018 Draft Call Letter had minimal updates, however, there were important impacts to risk adjustment.

One of the most controversial areas of focus for risk adjustment is around the data submission transition from the Risk Adjustment Processing System (RAPS) to the Encounter Data Processing System (EDPS). When this transition began in 2012, the industry knew it would be a big lift to implement but had no idea how dramatically it would impact the risk score results and downstream financials. CMS began a “phase-in” approach in 2016 where the RAPS risk score was weighted 90%, and the EDPS risk score was weighted 10%, in calculation of the overall risk score. For 2017, the weight for EDPS was increased to 25%, and the weight for RAPS was decreased to 75%. CMS was clear it would increase the EDPS percentage each year until RAPS was phased out entirely. It was anticipated for 2018 EDPS and RAPS would be weighted evenly at 50%, but in the 2018 Draft Call Letter, no increase for the EDPS submission was proposed.

Throughout 2016, there was a large focus on reviewing the risk scores between the RAPS and EDPS submissions to ensure the risk scores between the two submissions were comparable. It became very clear in the early stages of analysis there were drastic differences between the risk scores that were calculated. Organizations became very concerned and outspoken about the EDPS data submission results. EDPS involves several more steps before a claim or encounter becomes an accepted record and is included in the risk score process. These additional steps allow the opportunity for data to be excluded which should otherwise be included.

Gorman Health Group has been conducting ongoing analysis between the RAPS and EDPS submissions and noticed the following, which should be areas of focus for each health plan in 2017 and going forward:

  • Accuracy of front-end membership and claims systems
  • Oversight of the data submissions process
  • Establishing solid internal controls for checks and balances
  • Thorough documentation and data flows
  • Reconciliation of internal data, submissions, and errors

These areas are within the control of the health plan to improve the risk score accuracy between the two submissions. Each health plan should know how data flows through their organization and the different controls that are in place to ensure accuracy. Gorman Health Group has helped many clients achieve visibility into their own information through the use of Valencia™ and mitigate their risk during a Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) audit.

When preparing comments to submit to CMS in response to the 2018 Draft Call Letter, be sure to evaluate what you control within your organization and what CMS controls.

Be prepared, and “know your data story.”

 

Resources

Gorman Health Group’s Summary and Analysis of the 2018 Medicare Advantage and Part D Advance Notice and Draft Call Letter is now available. Download now >>

Selecting the right partners and implementing the right tools to produce valuable and actionable data will allow clinicians and health plans to prioritize interventions, stratify the populations they are managing and identify those most at risk. Contact us to learn how we can help your organization >>

The Gorman Health Group 2017 Forum Conference Brochure and Preliminary Agenda Is Now Available! Download it now to see the topics we have in store for you at this year’s event. Register now for the Gorman Health Group 2017 Forum, April 26-27, 2017, at the JW Marriott New Orleans.

Contact Us
Jessica Smith

About Jessica Smith

Jessica Smith is Vice President of Healthcare Analytics & Risk Adjustment Solutions at Gorman Health Group (GHG). In this role, she is responsible for the execution and oversight of risk adjustment consulting services for managed care, provider practice, and commercial market clients, and leading and integrating cross-functional teams to ensure superior performance outcomes related to risk adjustment operations. Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *