The policy analysis and guidance you need by the experts you trust, daily.
- After Hours
- Agent Oversight
- Brain Food
- Health Insurance Exchanges
- Part D
- Performance Optimization
- Policy & Health Reform
- Prospective Evaluations
- Provider Relations
- Risk Adjustment
- Sales & Marketing
- Star Ratings
- Regan Pennypacker on Latest Audit Enforcement Actions Issued by CMS
- Kathleen Chapman on 2019 Medicare Advantage Rate Announcement & Call Letter
- Michelle Juhanson on Latest Audit Enforcement Actions Issued by CMS
- Alan Mittermaier on MA and Part D Proposed Rule Increases Plan Flexibility, Reduces Regulatory Burden
- Sharon Willliams on A New Source of Capital for Star Ratings and Clinical Innovations
This has shaped up to be an extremely active year for Medicaid. From fighting off proposals to cutting funding from the program, to the Trump Administration’s efforts to change Medicaid administratively as we know it, to active state legislatures and, in a couple of cases, citizen referendums, to changing their states approach to Medicaid, this is arguably the most active time since the fallout of the NFIB vs. Sebelius case, which decided the federal government could not mandate state participation in Medicaid expansion.
There was quite a bit of activity in Medicaid expansion efforts this week, with remarkable strides made. In case you had trouble keeping up with all the news, here is a rundown of the biggest developments.
The Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP) released its now biannual report on state telehealth policies and Medicaid. While many states are beginning to expand telehealth reimbursement, others continue to restrict and place limitations on telehealth-delivered services. Although each state’s laws, regulations, and Medicaid program policies differ significantly, certain trends are evident when examining the various policies. Live video Medicaid reimbursement, for example, continues to far exceed reimbursement for store and forward and remote patient monitoring (RPM).
On March 23, 2018, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released a proposed rule that would provide for a reduction of administrative burden with states that have high rates of Medicaid managed care enrollment. In the past, states with high enrollment have raised concerns regarding administrative burden when they have to determine whether Medicaid payments in Fee-for-Service systems are sufficient to enlist providers to ensure beneficiary access to covered care and services consistent with the statute.
In the January 11, 2018, letter published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) giving the green light for states to pursue adding work requirements to their Section 1115 waiver programs, the Trump administration, through CMS, has looked to push the envelope as to how far they can modify the Medicaid program as we know it. Changes have not only included typical proposed structural changes, such as turning Medicaid into a block grant program, but new proposals are aimed at the very heart of what Medicaid means—and these proposed changes are being led by the states.
As 2018 and Year 2 of the chaotic Trump Administration kick off, trying to predict what will happen in Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act is as challenging as ever. It’s a midterm election year with terrible headwinds for the GOP, so the legislative calendar is abbreviated, and partisan rancor will peak. That makes it less likely Republicans will get to do much damage but also more likely they will try to serve up red meat for their base, like a return to “repeal and replace.” Congressional leaders, fresh off their billionaire bailout tax bill, are already talking about taking up “reform” (aka cuts) of Medicare and Medicaid and other social welfare programs. The only thing that is certain is 2018 will be another battleground year for government health programs.
As CMS Administrator Verma Announces Obama-Era Medicaid Policy Reversals, States Signal Support for Medicaid Expansion
Tuesday was a big day for Medicaid policy, with both a rollback of Obama Era policy reversals and a movement toward more states adopting Obamacare’s Medicaid Expansion.